Kamala Harris is finally saying the quiet part out loud — and it’s not flattering for Joe Biden. In the first juicy excerpts from her upcoming memoir, “107 Days,” the former Vice President goes full Shakespearean betrayal on her old boss. Picture this: the woman who once called Joe Biden a “great leader” on the campaign trail is now painting him as a reckless egomaniac who couldn’t take a hint — or give up power gracefully.
Ah yes, loyalty in Washington: it lasts right up until the book deal clears.
Let’s unpack what’s going on here. Kamala didn’t just lose the 2024 election — she’s trying to make sure she doesn’t take the blame for Biden’s trainwreck of a re-election campaign. And what better way to do that than to toss the guy who picked her out of the doldrums, after she had been forced to drop out early from the primaries for lack of support and votes, to be his #2, to be the Vice-President of the United States. AND, perhaps as a sign of how angry she really is at her old boss, she not only scolded him for not dropping out of the election sooner, but nailed him for a litany of other poor decisions.
Her upcoming book is shaping up to be more than just a retelling or more coddling of the infirm former leader of the free world, but rather a savage beat down of epic proportions that ultimately cost her the presidency. Buckle up for these details…
According to Harris, the White House turned into a cult of “It’s Joe and Jill’s decision,” like some weird political seance. She now calls that groupthink “recklessness.” Funny, back when she was cashing in on the perks of being second-in-command, it was called “loyalty.” But now? Now it’s ego. Ambition. A dangerous game. Sure, Kamala, and you were just the innocent bystander in all this, right?
Let’s be honest here: Kamala’s not writing this book out of patriotic duty. She’s trying to rewrite history — her history. She wants you to believe she was the wise, selfless one behind the scenes, urging caution while poor ol’ Joe bumbled into disaster. But if she really thought Biden was too old, too frail, or too out of touch to run again, she had every opportunity to say so. She didn’t. Why? Because that would’ve made her look “self-serving,” as she admits.
Translation: she wanted to be President, but she didn’t want to look like she wanted to be President. Welcome to the most awkward job interview in American politics.
She also throws shade at Biden’s staff, accusing them of sabotaging her public image and fanning the flames of every bad headline. That’s rich coming from someone who had an entire White House comms team and still couldn’t explain what she was doing at the border. Remember when she was named “border czar” and then vanished faster than CNN’s ratings after Trump left office? Apparently, that was all part of a vast anti-Kamala conspiracy — not incompetence, of course.
She complains the White House never defended her. Maybe that’s because defending Kamala Harris always felt like trying to sell a car with no engine. Voters didn’t buy it, and neither did her own party. Her approval ratings tanked. Her 2024 campaign barely sputtered before running out of gas. And now, she’s trying to salvage her legacy with a tell-all that’s more about blame-shifting than truth-telling.
But the most telling line in the whole excerpt? “If I did well, he did well.” That’s the core of it. Kamala thinks the real problem was that she wasn’t given enough spotlight. Not the economy. Not the border crisis. Not crime. Not Biden’s age or mental fog. No, the real failure was that Kamala wasn’t propped up enough.
This is the Democrat Party in 2025: a circular firing squad of egos, memoirs, and finger-pointing. Joe Biden is out. Kamala Harris is bitter. And the American people are left wondering which one of them was actually in charge while the country slid off a cliff.
And if Kamala’s already setting fire to the Biden legacy in Chapter One, just imagine what else is coming in the rest of the book. Or worse — what she’s still not telling us.